| 19 comments ]

Jim Groom brings a new term into being in a recent post -- edupunk.

There's a couple reasons why I find the term useful, but the most important is that it captures the cultural revulsion many of us feel with the appropriation of the Learning 2.0 movement by corporations such as Blackboard. Learning 2.0, like punk, is a DIY movement. Like punk it favors technical accessibility over grand design.

And to people like us, Learning 2.0, if it is to remain relevant, must not be relegated to the dustbin of "features" or "products". It's neither a product or a process, but a way of approaching things, of which products are only one of the results.

Yet all the 2.0 formulations -- Classroom 2.0, Learning 2.0, and even Web 2.0 itself -- work against this very notion that what we are chasing here is not product, but style. What does the 2.0 version number symbolize if not a shrink-wrapped box or set of features?

What began as a clever pun has outlived its usefulness to us. We've known that for a while, but as companies begin to reduce the social web to a set of ingredients in their products -- we have to go further than whether product x allows trackbacks or not.

"Edupunk" gets us there -- with its implication of technical accessibility, a DIY ethic, quick and dirty over grand design, and a suspicion of corporate appropriation it hits a lot of the right notes.

The wrong notes it hits are mainly historical -- because of course punk had surprisingly little social impact -- and it's worth remembering the same attitudes that kept it pure relegated it to being a tribal phenomenon rather than a broad cultural movement. Punk culture valued its exile from the mainstream. We want to change the world.

That inevitiably leads to a lot of compromises. But when we stray too far into the world of enterprise software, three-month timelines and eight page budgets -- when we have to concede the assessment system will likely be a centralized corporate affair -- on days like that, maybe edupunk is the cassette we throw into the tape deck on the way home, the tape that reminds us loudly of who we are, in three chords or less.

It's obviously late here ... thoughts?

19 comments

What’s this about Edupunk? | 2¢ Worth said... @ May 28, 2008 at 8:35 AM

[...] examples in Permapunk.  Another, more direct explanation comes from Mike Caulfield in Edupunk.  It seems to be a rejection of  recent moves, among corporate contributors to the [...]

EDUPUNK poster boy at bavatuesdays said... @ May 28, 2008 at 11:34 AM

[...] that Mike Caulfield has already provided an awesome way to start thinking about the DIY spirit of EDUPUNK, I’ll figured I’d do my part by shaving my head, busting out the sharpee, and sporting [...]

netzlernen.ch - Edupunk said... @ May 30, 2008 at 12:19 AM

[...] in Bildungstechnologie unterstützt und propagiert. Tatsächlich kommen Begriffe wie «learning 2.0 movement» (Mike Caulfield) auf, die auf die Idee hinter Web 2.0 und weniger auf die Tools verweist. [...]

Open Monologue » More thoughts on edupunk said... @ May 30, 2008 at 8:11 PM

[...] pro-disorder, pro-freedom, pro-messiness and pro-anti-establishment. That last one made me chuckle. Mike Caulfield eloquently describes what edupunk is against: … it captures the cultural revulsion many of us feel with [...]

Jim said... @ June 1, 2008 at 9:28 PM

Mike,

Did you see this yet?
http://blog.wfmu.org/freeform/2008/06/the-human-leagu.html

You are on to something if WFMU thinks it is cool :) Interesting in regards to Rotten;s derision, and the pure avant quality of the art.

Suspect Metaphor » Idle Learning and Disruptive Technology said... @ June 3, 2008 at 6:45 AM

[...] for both starting the WP page and pointing this out. Equally interesting are the term’s rapid dissemination and traditional media [...]

Mike said... @ June 3, 2008 at 6:52 AM

@Jim -- There's a fascinating history there with London v. Sheffield. You can imagine it as if there was not a rivalry between west coast and east coast punk here, but if the rivalry had been between the lower east side and Newark.

OK, maybe that's overstatement. But there's more than a little snobbery in Rotten's comment (and as I'm sure you know, Rotten's PIL veered much more toward the Sheffield part of the equation (this is not a love soooongg...). So it's an interesting quote in that way as well.

Put Made in Sheffield into your Netflix though, ASAP. It will really blow your mind.

Edupunk | Tim Schlotfeldt und Bildungsberatung said... @ June 3, 2008 at 7:47 AM

[...] Mike Caulfield: Edupunk [...]

And He Blogs » Seriously! Stop taking Edupunk so seriously said... @ June 3, 2008 at 1:54 PM

[...] over some garbage cans. Let’s see there’s Jim’s original post, the comments, the definition, the critique, the defense, the “narcissism”, the Wikipedia article, the other article [...]

Dominik Lukes said... @ June 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM

A bit late to the party. I love the term Edupunk for its indeterminedness and potential for spawning new things and disrupting or even destroying the boundaries of our comfort zones. Who will be the first to register edupunk.org?

And of course, I blogged about it: http://research.edu.uea.ac.uk/dominiklukes/2008/jun/edupunkagainstblackboardforelearning20andwhatnext asking the question what 'edugigs', 'edusquats' and 'educommunes' would look like.

Tad Suiter said... @ June 5, 2008 at 1:23 AM

Mike--

I thought of the physical zine idea when I read that, too...

But why bother printing and mailing?
Put it up on the web as a pdf. With directions: Print, fold, staple. To paraphrase MR&R, "Print Your Own ****ing Zine."

What could be more DIY than that?
Being mindful of the digital divide, as well as the ease of archiving paper, it'd be wise to provide printed copies upon request, but why should that be the default mechanism?

Get people into DIY habits, and you've made a lasting impact.

Anarchy In The UK « UK Web Focus said... @ June 9, 2008 at 12:21 AM

[...] recent buzz on Twitter and in the blogosphere over the term ‘edupunk’. Mike Caulfield likes the term because “it captures the cultural revulsion many of us feel with the appropriation of the [...]

On Edupunk at cac.ophony.org said... @ June 11, 2008 at 12:18 PM

[...] (here are musings and run downs by Mike Caulfield, Stephen Downes, and D’Arcy Norman) is a new name for ideas that have been bouncing around [...]

Rowin’s blog » Blog Archive » EduPunk’s not dead? said... @ July 4, 2008 at 2:02 AM

[...] Monday night featuring the Manic Street Preachers of EduPunk (that’s Martin Weller, Mike Caulfield and Katherine ‘LibPunk’ Greenhill). Part of the ongoing Sounds of the [...]

VAPERS » Blog Archive » RSS Feed for Tags in YouTube said... @ July 19, 2008 at 12:06 PM

[...] (here are musings and run downs by Mike Caulfield, Stephen Downes, and D’Arcy Norman) is a new name for ideas that have been bouncing around [...]

El sentido Edupunk en el Activismo Bibliotecario PARTE 2 « “Abatido, despreciado y maltrecho” BeNeoBeat! said... @ October 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM

[...] Mike Caulfield. Edupunk. [...]

jimgroom » EDUPUNK poster boy said... @ November 6, 2008 at 3:46 PM

[...] that Mike Caulfield has already provided an awesome way to start thinking about the DIY spirit of EDUPUNK, I figured I’d do my part by shaving my head, busting out the sharpee, and sporting my WordPress [...]

El sentido Edupunk en el Activismo Bibliotecario PARTE 1 « Bibliopunk: Lectura, derechos y tecnologías said... @ September 15, 2009 at 4:42 AM

[...] Mike Caulfield. Edupunk. [...]

El sentido Edupunk en el Activismo Bibliotecario PARTE 2 « Bibliopunk: Lectura, derechos y tecnologías said... @ September 15, 2009 at 4:47 AM

[...] Mike Caulfield. Edupunk. [...]

Post a Comment